A George Finegold Blog

New Content Always Being Added- Our "RESOURCE" List Has Many New Links

PRIOR POSTS CAN BE ACCESSED BY CLICKING ON "OLDER POSTS" FOLLOWING THE LAST POST ON THIS PAGE

THANK YOU - CLUB SUPPORTERS

A SPECIAL THANKS to all the Manufacturers and Distributors that have contributed their various promotional material and samples to our Club. Our meetings are very interesting thanks to this material.

A SHORT VIDEO COURSE ON THE PROPER STANCE AND POSITION FOR PISTOL SHOOTING

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

What's a good trigger pull?


By Caleb | April 7, 2010 at 08:21 | Categories: shooting | URL: http://wp.me/pqZBS-1ut

One of the most common topics of discussion on gun websites, magazines, and TV shows is the weight of the trigger pull of gun X. Usually heard as "my CQB Tactical Destroyer has a 2.5 pound trigger pull!" or "I had to use a fish scale to measure the trigger pull of the Hi Point it was so heavy". Many pixels have died to bring us this information, and yet for whatever reason people seem to think a light trigger pull is almost a badge of honor. I recently met a guy that was talking about how he had his Glock trigger down to 2.5 pounds or some absurd number, which made me wonder "why?"

I tend to fall in the school of thought that thinks that a light trigger pull isn't necessarily a good thing for self defense, or even for competition. Here's the logical process behind that though - I started shooting serious competitions at the Academy for the collegiate pistol team. I used an earlier version of the Pardini SP pistol in .22,

which being a bullseye .22 had a trigger pull that was adjustable. I was essentially issued this gun by the team, and I never bothered with screwing around with adjusting the pull, I'd imagine based on current knowledge that it was probably around 2.5 pounds, which was plenty light.

I also competed in Free Pistol, or 50m Pistol as it's known elsewhere. Free pistol is a weird bullseye sport that uses guns that have evolved to the point where they don't really resemble firearms any more.

The Pardini pictured at left has a factory trigger pull of 50 grams - that's 0.11 pounds if you're wondering. For reference, a quarter weighs about 6 grams, so a stack of 9 quarters would be enough to make this gun go "bang".

Now, you'd think that because my real introduction to serious shooting was with high end competition guns with great triggers that I'd demand light trigger pull weights on all my guns - but it's precisely the opposite. Coming in to shooting from NRA Collegiate Pistol taught me that the most important thing in the world isn't the weight of your trigger, but how you manage the trigger. With a 0.1 pound trigger, any mashing or jerking is magnified significantly, and turns a 10 into an unacceptable 7.

Fast forward 10 years, and now the lightest trigger pull on any of my competition guns comes in around 9 pounds. Yes, I shoot revolvers exclusively, but even though the triggers are heavy doesn't mean they're bad. Personally, the most important factor in whether or not a trigger is good or bad isn't the weight, but rather how smooth it is. I'll take a 12 pound double action revolver trigger that's nice and smooth over a gritty, stacking 5 pound trigger any day of the week. Even Jerry Miculek is credited with saying that the best action job you can give a revolver is to dry fire it 3000 times; from personal experience I can tell you that doing that will make the bearing surfaces plenty smooth.

The point of all of this is to establish that you don't need a light trigger to shoot well - in fact a light trigger can actually hurt your ability to shoot well by masking flinch and jerk that would affect shots if fired from a "duty" trigger pull. If you're shooting IDPA or USPSA there isn't any reason to screw around with the pull weight on your gun unless you're running head to head with Dave Sevigny and need to shave 0.003 seconds off your splits. Shooting a gun with a light trigger isn't going to make you a better shot - but practicing your trigger pull with lots and lots of dry fire or a Crimson Trace laser will.


No comments:

***NEW SITE*** Great for all Ruger 10/22 Gun Owners - RUGER22.com

RBAR.GIF - 700 bytes
All of us here at Ruger22.com are happy to bring you a new review and testing story, on both the NEW PLASTIC 10/22 TRIGGER GUARD (housing) and new bushingless designed hammer! You will also find everything you ever wanted to know about your 10/22 RUGER.

bigtrig.jpg - 17380 Bytes
(CLICK HERE FOR MORE.....)

THE CONDITIONS OF READINESS...

The legendary guru of the combat 1911, Jeff Cooper, came up with the "Condition" system to define the state of readiness of the 1911-pattern pistol. The are:

Condition 0 - A round is in the chamber, hammer is cocked, and the safety is off.

Condition 1 - Also known as "cocked and locked," means a round is in the chamber, the hammer is cocked, and the manual thumb safety on the side of the frame is applied.

Condition 2 - A round is in the chamber and the hammer is down.

Condition 3 - The chamber is empty and hammer is down with a charged magazine in the gun.

Condition 4 - The chamber is empty, hammer is down and no magazine is in the gun.

The mode of readiness preferred by the experts is Condition One. Generally speaking, Condition One offers the best balance of readiness and safety. Its biggest drawback is that it looks scary to people who don't understand the operation and safety features of the pistol.

Condition Two is problematic for several reasons, and is the source of more negligent discharges than the other conditions. When you rack the slide to chamber a round in the 1911, the hammer is cocked and the manual safety is off. There is no way to avoid this with the 1911 design. In order to lower the hammer, the trigger must be pulled and the hammer lowered slowly with the thumb onto the firing pin, the end of which is only a few millimeters away from the primer of a live round. Should the thumb slip, the hammer would drop and fire the gun. Not only would a round be launched in circumstances which would be at best embarrassing and possibly tragic, but also the thumb would be behind the slide as it cycled, resulting in serious injury to the hand. A second problem with this condition is that the true 1911A1 does not have a firing pin block and an impact on the hammer which is resting on the firing pin could conceivably cause the gun to go off, although actual instances of this are virtually nonexistent. Finally, in order to fire the gun, the hammer must be manually cocked, again with the thumb. In an emergency situation, this adds another opportunity for something to go wrong and slows the acquisition of the sight picture.

Condition Three adds a degree of "insurance" against an accidental discharge since there is no round in the chamber. To bring the gun into action from the holster, the pistol must be drawn and the slide racked as the pistol is brought to bear on the target. This draw is usually called "the Israeli draw" since it was taught by Israeli security and defense forces. Some of the real expert trainers can do an Israeli draw faster than most of us can do a simple draw, but for most of us, the Israeli draw adds a degree of complexity, an extra step, and an opening for mistakes in the process of getting the front sight onto the target.

Using the "half-cock" as a safety

The half-cock notch on the M1911 is really intended as a "fail-safe" and is not recommended as a safety. However, it has been used as a mode of carry. From Dale Ireland comes this interesting piece of service history from WWII:

When the hammer is pulled back just a few millimeters it "half cocks" and pulling the trigger will not fire the gun [on genuine mil-spec G.I. pistols]. I imagine this is an unsafe and not a recommended safety position. The reason I bring it up however is that it was a commonly used position especially by left-handers in WWII. My father carried his 1911 (not A1) to Enewitok, Leyte, first wave at Luzon, the battle inside Intramuros, and until he was finally shot near Ipo dam. He tells me that he regularly used the half cocked safety position especially at night and patrolling because bringing the weapon to the full cocked position from the half cocked created much less noise and he was left handed so he couldn't use the thumb safety effectively. He said using the half cocked position was all about noise reduction for lefties while maintaining a small amount of safety that could quickly be released.

Again, the half-cock is intended as a fail-safe in the event that the sear hooks were to fail, and it is not recommended as a mode of carry. It should also be noted that on guns with "Series 80" type hammers, the hammer will fall from half-cock when the trigger is pulled. This would include guns from Springfield Armory and modern production Colts. But, if you happen to be a south paw and find yourself in the jungle with a G.I. M1911A1 and surrounded by enemy troops, the half-cock might be an option.

Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory